Since the start of the Arab revolutions, the “like”
has become a political “obligation”. One has to join pages and support them and
he/she has to encourage written posts and notes and build support for them.
More importantly, he has to adapt the meaning of his “likes” to the nature of
the topics which he/she follows. With the Syrian revolution, this adaptation
has become a difficult, almost impossible, issue. News of that glorious and
defiant country are presented everyday on both public and private pages
instigating emotional charges, and those pages need a dense spray of “likes” to
publicise their contents. For example, there is no “like” that is sufficient to
express the amazement by the courage of the people of Daraa, Banyas, Douma, Deir
Ezzor, Daraya and Idlib as they face tanks with cries for Freedom. No “like”
can convey the magnitude of pride and delight in the people of Homs
and Hama . No
“like” can convey the love of friends living in Syria or abroad waiting for the
victory of their people, with Syria alive in their minds and hearts. No “like”
can convey the admiration of the sarcastic spirit as it deconstruct the tyrant’
authority and brings down all the prestige he created for himself and which
“his” intelligence services enforced. Further, no “like” is able to contain the
happiness felt when a detainee is released, that detainee who has become so
familiar as a result of so many friends posting his/her photo on their pages or
“profiles”, and one cannot but feel a kind of friendship with him/her and a
right to celebrate his/her freedom...
So this is the “like”. Since at least April 2011 it has become strongly
associated with Syria, with that country whose sons and daughters cling to the will
to live, and with those whose names have turned into synonyms of Freedom…
Freedom that not only deserves a “like”, but millions of “likes”.
Ziad Majed